The babies would have no discipline....so KILL THEM!
The Marketing of Evil in Action & Liberal Insanity at it's Worst: The following is a direct quote from Timetoo blogspot. I don't know how old "Time" is, but he sure has been feed a big bowl of BS!
"Money is a BIG problem and the reason some choose abortion. If Republicans don't want abortions, then what is their solution to help these mothers keep their babies? And don't just say don't get pregnant. That's the same unrealistic answer as telling teenagers not to have sex. Good advice but no answer to what to do if teenagers DO have sex or get pregnant. How about take responsibility for your actions. You can't legislate morality. You can't change basic human urges with a bill from Congress. Yes you can legislate morality, we have and we do, see the US Constitution.
Republicans have no follow-up to their abstain from sex. or no abortion message. You mean to say Republicans have no "Federal Family" awaiting you and your child with a nice house, green grass, and a Pickett fence if you chose NOT to abstain from sex. How dare they!
They stop funding and education. An informed person makes better decisions. If we ban abortion, who's going to help poor single females raise these children? With no help, depression and apathy set in. Your right! Who will take care of you? Unlike most from your liberal spoiled rotten generation, your Parents or Grandparents are doing the parenting and providing a home, food, and clothes for your freedom to act on your basic human urges. In addition, I and every other Tax Payer is paying to raise your family. Sounds Socialist and Communist to me, but you say that is NOT your goal. I say BS!
These kids would have no discipline or direction. They also would carry the pscycological scar of not being wanted. If your not willing to help, then you should not force women to have babies they don't want." Ahhh! Classic! Lets forget about the baby. Let's forget about the baby being painfully ripped apart in the womb or being literally burned to death by a saline solution. Lets not consider for a moment that reality. Nope, let's kill the baby so the woman does not have to be inconvenienced. Lets also forget the devastation the woman will feel when she realizes what has just taken place. And that will happen! Perhaps it will happen right there at the clinic when she sees with her own eyes the Abortionist's assistant examining the jar or stainless steel bowl to make sure all the body parts have been removed from the womb.
Satan is loving You Time and that can't make you happy! You have mastered calling that which is Evil, Good. You have put YOU First, and God last. You are more concerned with KILLING a BABY, than that child living a life that would be in your opinion not worth living.
If you don't know God today, you better start your search real soon! The best place to start is on your knees.
This is NOT a Democrat, Republican issue. It is an issue of Life and Death, Right and Wrong, With God or Without God.
Pro-Choice? So is God, make your choice!
posted by Mark @ 5/31/2006 01:29:00 PM
28 comments
28 Comments:
your so full of misinformation. You even think I'm a woman, WRONG!
Of course your WRONG about everything, but that doesn't stop you. The hate spews out of you before you even know what your talking about.
You are sad, dude. The world won't dance to your tune so they are all wrong and sick. You are the only sane person in the world.
Try getting your facts straight before the next book burning, Adolph.
Dude, thanks for the absolute nothingness of a reply. The only one spewing hate appears to be you, hate for anything, anyone, and any idea that that exposes a self centered social and political philosophy wrapped in the blood of the most vunerable beings, babies, in this instance.
The facts, which you dude, always seem to have a problem with, are your own words. Deal with it.
i'm not a woman idiot.So who's got their facts wrong, Adolph? Jackass.
Don't worry Mark, he's the same idiot that trolled my site screaming "You're wrong!" without backing up any of his claims. Check my archives and witness his contradictory stupidity. His echo chamber of tin foil hat conspiracy theorists is even better. I see again he just simply told you how dumb you were, without backing up his points. Don't try it on his site, to spare himself of being humiliated, he simply won't post your response.
"You can't legislate morality. You can't change basic human urges with a bill from Congress."
I guess you missed the Constitution didn't you? And if that's the case, your argument is just as void. You can't legislate morality, even bad morality. So stop it you theocrat.
"An informed person makes better decisions"
If you believed in information, you libs wouldn't oppose the abortion regulations that require women to be informed of any fetal pain involved, and to be shown a sonogram. Why would you oppose a woman being as informed as possible? Because you are pro-abortion, not pro-choice.
"If we ban abortion, who's going to help poor single females raise these children? With no help, depression and apathy set in."
That might be a relevant question except that no one has shown me these great numbers of poor single women who are unable to care for their child. Maybe you could show me statistics? By the way, since we are not "legislating morality", don't act like its our responsiblity to help raise her children. I didn't have sex with her. That was her choice.
"These kids would have no discipline or direction. They also would carry the pscycological scar of not being wanted."
So kill them so they'll never find out they weren't wanted huh? You gotta love liberal logic.
"If your not willing to help, then you should not force women to have babies they don't want."
We are NOT forcing them to have children. They had sex. That was their CHOICE, my pro-choice friend. Sure, its a straight natural bodily function, so we can't deny them that. But so is child birth as a result. Unless you see pro-lifers putting a gun to a woman's head and forcing her to have sex, this argument, if you can even call it that, is moot. Try again.
"Let's forget about the baby being painfully ripped apart in the womb or being literally burned to death by a saline solution."
And that is much more humane then a woman having a child she doesn't want. Besides, its not like there are adoption agencies or anything...
Mark is right, Time, and you again, are wrong. You need Jesus. Like bad. Now run along back to your liberal bubble and let the grown-ups talk.
"i'm not a woman idiot"
Of course you are.
I posted Marks comments, he never replied to my comment.
Legislate whatever you want, the point is it doesn't work and 40 years has taught us that.
Did you know that when abortion was illeagle that it didn't stop abortions from happening. I'm sure your dumb enough to think that before Roe/Wade an abortion never happened in the USA.
I don't oppose those abortion regulations, wrong again. Women get that information and decide on abortion anyways. So you just want to outlaw it. Telling people what or what not, they can do with their bodies.
Having sex is not the same as giving birth. Try prevention education. Oh ya, you guys have outlawed that also.
Wow, the things you think, I think. So wrong. You have no idea what I think but presume to tell everyone what I think, I call that stupid.
Get your facts straight for the next book burning.
I guess I have to address your stupidity again. Okay, here goes:
1. "Did you know that when abortion was illeagle that it didn't stop abortions from happening."
Which is the same excuse you flaming liberals come up with to legalize and endorse everything. "They already do drugs, so legalize them." "They already have sex, so give them condoms." Brilliant. And that is "illegal", not "illeagle."
"Telling people what or what not, they can do with their bodies."
Actually, its telling people what they can and cannot do with their baby's body, so you're half right.
"Having sex is not the same as giving birth."
At least you were taught something of substance as a youth.
"Try prevention education. Oh ya, you guys have outlawed that also."
Really? Where? Or are you just flapping your gums again? Where did we OUTLAW prevention education? Is there no such thing as parents? Oh, yeah, you guys don't like parents raising children, you like the goverment doing that for you. Got it.
"You have no idea what I think but presume to tell everyone what I think, I call that stupid."
So everything you've posted so far isn't really what you think? If not, why are you posting it, and why are you surprised? What a silly human you are.
Again attacks, no positions. Thanks for pointing out the spelling errors.
You should point out your factual errors with just as much confidence.
You have no understanding of human behavior.
Thank GOD you and your ilk are are so stupid and hatefilled that never will a majority (or even close) agree with you.
Stop hiding behind the bible, Jesus preached against your kind of hate.
I'm still waiting for your position or solution to these problems, not just how hatefully you can attack me.
Your response is to point out my spelling errors, WOW what an intellectual come back.
Time,
FACT: before Roe v Wade there where approx 200-250 abrotions a year where the women suffered due to a non clinic environment, not the 100,000+ number that was made up and fed to the media. The people who did this, have admitted they made up the numbers.
FACT: It is pure EVIL at work to kill a baby instead of giving it up for adoption. Selfishness is Satan's tool, you seem to like that tool.
FACT: Taking responsiblity for your actions is a principle of a Free society. Guess you want Govt to clean up and pay for your idiotic choices, and if that won't happen, maybe Mommy and Daddy will take care of it for you!
FACT: Roe v Wade is a farce, a legal action based on a lie that a woman was raped(she was not) and the lawyers used Ms. Norma McCorvey as a pawn. She now speaks out against killing babies!
You Time apparently value the convenience of the pregnant mother more than the continued existence and development of the life of a child. Shame on you!
Time,
here is a solution for you: Stop supporting the legalization of Murdering a baby.
Sorry Time, the majority of people in this country are not with you, you will soon find that out!
For you to use Jesus as a basis for your point, is too funny if not so pathetic!
If you weren't so filled with hate, mabey you could get more people to agree with you. And facts don't seem to be your strong point. You have yet to correct your huge error. I am not a woman, yet you post still insists that I am. So when given the truth you ignoe it.
Time, are you on crack? I realize your a 'dude' and have not refered to you as a woman since. I'll correct the post if that makes you happy.
Now, why do you support killing babies, and why do you think taking responsibility for your actions is wrong?
Time: Before you get all hot and bothered about "attacks, no positions", we have stated our positions and supported them very clearly. You are the one who came on this site and started attacking and mouthing off. You pull the same crap every where you go don't you?
"Thank GOD you and your ilk are are so stupid and hatefilled that never will a majority (or even close) agree with you."
Obviously they do, or you wouldn't have an entire site dedicated to complaining about all these Republicans would you genius?
"You should point out your factual errors with just as much confidence."
Why don't you try pointing out those errors, instead of repeating yourself over and over again. Hate? Anyone with a mouse can go to my archives and look at the hate you posted there and here as well. Back up your own claims and then we can commence with shoving them down your throat.
"Back up your own claims and then we can commence with shoving them down your throat."
*laughing very hard!* Thanks!
I only came on to point out the errors of the post of lies and out of context statements you made about me.
I responded to the comments you made on my blog - you had no reply - nothing to say because there is nothing to say. Could it be that many people read my blog and you didn't want to look so stupid with all your factual mistakes? My readers are still laughing about you.
Why did you choose my blog to attack? You don't visit my blog. So out of the clear blue I get your hate filled attack. Highboy says I would not post your comments, I did, another lie by Highboy.
Say what you want, only Highboy reads it. Highboy, say what you want, only Mark reads it. Are you guys gay? Must be.
I did back up my claims, my readers backed up my claims. Who's backing up your claims, Highboy? I'm laughing real hard.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Time,
you say "I only came on to point out the errors of the post of lies and out of context statements you made about me."
I quoted you Word for Word, there are No errors, No lies, Nothing out of context as I posted your ENTIRE comments.
Your last comment to me, and the last comment made was
"Time said...
Mark,
I've read yor blog. Full of Hate. I feel sorry for you.
You mis-judge people so badly. No wonder, you don't even listen before you go into your hate speach.
Sorry to disappoint, I'm a guy, but you didn't want to get to know me even that far before you attacked me.
Wed May 31, 07:02:01 PM CDT"
I have heard that before here!
Now that we have cleared up that you have a penis, what say you about my very direct questions?
You Time are a typical liberal coward with a Big Mouth and Nothing to back it up with. Answer my last comment's questions based on your exact words or go do some soul searching.
TIME says "I did back up my claims, my readers backed up my claims. Who's backing up your claims, Highboy? I'm laughing real hard."
Sorry Time, didn't see anything added by your readers as of "Wed May 31, 07:02:01 PM CDT" And today is June 2, 2006 7:23PM ESDT. Nice bubble you live in.
TIME asks "Are you guys gay? Must be."
Yes I am very gay, happy indeed!
You sound like a immature 12 year old btw with remarks like that, thanks for proving my point once again.
Time, you posted EXACT same comment twice at 6:21pm, so I deleted one of them.
Probably your Big Man Hands hit a button twice inadvertently. lol
oh and btw Time, your love fest with Robert Bayn and Justin Morris the homosexual "priest" would not debate me on the issues I presented. Robert deleted all my comments and Justin would change the subject and make me follow his posts all over his web site, which is now www.capitalpill.com for anyone who wants a chuckle.
Justin Morris the 'man of HIS personal God' is just that. His principles, His 'Christian' faith, His values, His Pride in His own Sin, will be refuted and will not be unchallenged. He is Not God and should stop legitimizing Evil and calling it Holy! Eternal consequences are at stake to those that do.
Time: In case you missed it, Mark is not the only person who reads my blog. You know that. You've been there. When it comes to outside contribution my blog runs circles around yours, because I give facts and you make baseless allegations.
"I did back up my claims, my readers backed up my claims"
Show me. That's what I thought. Like I said, go back to your little echo chamber (with what, 2, maybe 3 regular commenters?) and leave the debate to us grown ups.
You're right. Capitol Pill is good for a chuckle. That whole little (and I mean little) circle is rather comical. They take a liberal's knack for slander conspiracy theory to a whole new level. These guys would put some of the Canadian liberals I know to shame with their ignorance.
I have nothing to do with what Robert and Justin decided to do with you. I can understand it , you don't debate you just attack.
You did not post my comments completely, you posted only the sentences that you wanted. I will probably do what Robert and Justin did because again you don't debate you just attack.
"again you don't debate you just attack." said the pot to the kettle. You haven't debated anything yet. You attacked. Just like you did on my site. I posted all of your comments to the fullest, so the evidence is against you. You are the most dishonest blogger I have yet to come across.
Now maybe we can get to the part where you start responding:
1. You say Mark is the only person to read my blog. My blog proves you wrong. Explain the comment then.
2. You say you and your readers have backed up your claims with reliable sources. What are these claims, and what sources do you back them up with?
Try responding to the arguments, try real hard.
Time,
You are lieing and you know it, otherwise please comment on what I left out. I posted an entire comment, word for word, made by you. NOTHING was left out. Hence your reluctance to show otherwise. Now, enough of that, you can on your own re-think your views.
"attack" as you say, really means exposing a lie, revealing a Truth that doesn't square with Evil, wrong, or sin. Like I said before, Pride is the only thing standing between you and Truth. I hope you lose that pride, and walk and speak in truth. btw, absolute Truth is found in only one source, and it ain't earthly.
wow.
why isnt it illegal to smoke or drink while pregnant? isnt this just as important?
also, why isnt it illegal to say G*d D*mn? how come we arent protected from blasphemy?
i understand the caring for other people, but i think it is up to a woman to decide about the baby that is dependent on her.
"i understand the caring for other people, but i think it is up to a woman to decide about the baby that is dependent on her."
That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. So do you use that logic when the baby is out of the womb? If not, why? Seems to me women are saying the only thing that defines life anymore is geographic location.
"why isnt it illegal to smoke or drink while pregnant? isnt this just as important?"
You're equating this to the deliberate murder of a fetus?
"also, why isnt it illegal to say G*d D*mn? how come we arent protected from blasphemy?"
You're equating this to the deliberate murder of a fetus? Could you be any more irrelevant?
"you're equating this to the deliberate murder of a fetus?"(in reference to smoking or drinking while pregnant)
- yes. why not? is deliberate deformation or retardation not just as important?
"you're equating this to the deliberate murder of a fetus? could you be any more irrelevant?"
- i could be more irrelevant. proof: i love hot dogs. (answers the second question)
- "I tell you the truth, all the sins and blasphemies of men will be forgiven them. 29But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; he is guilty of an eternal sin." - Mark 3:28-29
yes. i am comparing them. seems as though they are weighed equally. both go against God's word, simple as that(I will always concede that abortion is not allowed in Christianity, but I will also concede that non-Christians should be forced to live by Christian law). if premarital sex, abortion, and the Lord's name in vain are all equally offensive to Him(but are trumped by blasphemy), then why not lobby against all of those? it seems illogical to me. if A is bad, B is bad, and C is bad, and the weight of the "badness" is equal, then the response to each and time spent to prevent A, B, or C should be equivalent.
it is hard to wrap our minds around, but we can all be forgiven for anything but blasphemy. therefore, that puts abortion, premarital and extramarital sex, and gambling all on the same page to me. therefore acting against or barring them in society based on our Bible is fine, but i find it illogical to pick and choose what we deem as forgivable by society in general. you can love your Bible and also love someone else who doesnt love your Bible. the problem that Christians have is that they cant keep their nose out of someone else's business(i.e. abortion, gambling, the Da Vinci Code movie), but this topic could be discussed in another, more according blog.
"- yes. why not? is deliberate deformation or retardation not just as important"
IF it happens sure. But it doesn't all the time does it? However, aborted babies are always aborted.
"i am comparing them. seems as though they are weighed equally. both go against God's word, simple as that"
That WOULD be relevant if that were the only reason to oppose abortion. But its not. Because you don't have to be a Christian to have common sense do you Jaz? Why is it if I kick my dog hard enough, I'll at the least pay a fine, maybe even do jail time if I really get nasty with him. You're telling me that DOGS deserve more rights and protections than an unborn fetus? When WOULD you consider it murder? Does the baby have to have a heart? Lungs? What about brain waves, what activity? Is there a standard? Or do we just acknowledge that abortion is murder and just not care?
"they cant keep their nose out of someone else's business"
Sorry, when 1.3 million babies are being aborted every year, I MADE it my business. Its murder, and pro-choicers have yet to adequately prove otherwise. But if its another blog you're looking for go here.
Post a Comment
<< Home