Saturday, February 17, 2007

"Homophobe": The new "N" word not only used by arrogant "gay" activist, but the mainstream media

After watching several recent news broadcasts using the "H" word, I think it is important we re-visit DL Foster's take on this systematic approach to making one of life's (spiritual and physical) destroying acts, a birth right.


I want to be the first to go on record demanding the banning of H-word. The H-word is infamously the ugliest social slur ever created. The disgusting tone and the arrogant elitism behind it has no place in our language.

People, its time to ban use of the word "homophobe".

With all the fuss over the
N-word (that's nigger or nigga in case you didn't know), we ought to take a fresh look at other equally offensive words. Words that are used to degrade and dehumanize a whole class of people simply because of what they believe or who they are. Michael Richards' n-word tirade only demonstrated that what's in you is gonna come out when the real you gets worked up. It wasn't an accident and it wasn't reflex reaction at all. Richards meant to say it in the most degrading way he could muster up. Now, the Comedy Club has banned its use and in the process revived a new national debate about its use.

So while we are in the banning mood, let's get rid of this nasty, hateful word. The homosexual activist community are the main culprits in the use of the h-word. Just like the hateful white racists of the Jim Crow era, they use the h-word as a weapon to silence, intimidate and subjugate their opposition. They call religious leaders, political leaders, parents, Even if a person simply and innocently questions the alleged normality of homosexuality, he or she is automatically branded a "homophobe". No one outside of the elitist gay activist's threshold of false social acceptance seems to be immune from the demeaning word. Actually its become quite fashionable for gays to hurl the nasty epithet at ordinary people who refuse to accept homosexuality as normal.But its time for a change. Bernard Chapin, a Chicago writer noted:

One can be called a homophobe nowadays due to asking questions like, “So what exactly is the point of this parade?” or “What are you guys proud of here?” Just by asking a few questions (of which there are no easy answers) one can receive the same generic label that was applied to the vile murderers of Matthew Shepard. It has been my personal experience that merely disagreeing with some of the more vehement gay activists results in one quickly being grouped into an axis of hate. It doesn’t seem to matter what the specifics of the argument happen to be as, regardless of what you say, they’ll trolley out the same stale, cookie-cutter, accusation of homophobia. Perhaps if they changed the name of their insult to “gaytotalitarianaphobe” there might be some merit to their claims."

Award winning novelist and playwright Orson Card, writing for Meridian Magazine, warns that the h-word is the natural outgrowth of a fantastic lie:

A postulated but unproven genetic disposition toward homosexuality is supposed to be embraced and accepted by everyone as "perfectly natural" -- but the far stronger and almost universal genetic disposition toward having children and grandchildren is to be suppressed, kept to yourself, treated as a mental illness. You're unhappy that your son wants to marry a boy? Then you're sick, dangerous, a homophobe, filled with hate. Control your natural desires or be branded as evil by every movie and TV show coming out of P.C. Hollywood!

David Bernstein uses the h-word in a brazen comparison to the phrase "house nigga".

Some have complained that blacks use the n-word against other blacks. Black gay activists do the same with the h-word.

I say its time for a change.

I could not agree more!

Homophobic is a Godless truthless word, with an evil foundation. Its use has the goal of keeping the truth of Christ from the hearts and minds of those who need it most. i.e. those who want to minimize and or replace the teaching's of Christ.

Christ demanded that all of our lives be subject to Him, not the parts we like. To live otherwise, is to live in the darkness of a flesh inspired world and a flesh inspired truth. There is only death and destruction found in such a 'love of this world'. Christ told us as much.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

after readings everything you said i can tell your a total homophode. what gives dude

~Deb said...

Everyone has their right to not accept homosexuality and/or not accept homophobic views. Homosexuality is a real word and it’s even used in the bible! It’s not a negative word. It became a negative word when people used the slang or shortened the word up to ‘homo’. It was usually blurted out in a derogatory manner. But still – the word ‘homo’ is not negative. It’s only negative with the tone of voice put into it.

You know, I am so sick and tired of these “gay pride marches”. Seriously, the gay and lesbian community adopted this word “pride” when not realizing that the word in itself is negative. It stands for proud and arrogant. It also means they’re not humble. I was always against these gay pride events and never attended them. They flaunt their sexuality as if to say having sex with any Dick, Jane or Pat was okay to do.

Even those stupid bumper stickers, “I’m proud to be gay!” I wish – I only wish some straight guy would put a bumper sticker on his car that reads, “I’m straight and proud!” Watch how furious the homosexuals get over that one! Seriously though, the gay and lesbian community give themselves a bad name with the things that they stand for. I totally agree with you on that.

Of course, you and I will disagree upon the monogamous nature of two people of the same gender being together, however, promiscuity runs wild in ‘the community’, as well as the heterosexual world too though. So it works both ways.

Back to the ‘bad words’. Get over it! (In general.) Homosexuals need to get over the use of “homo” and the people who judge homosexuals or even ‘hate’ them need to get over the word “homophobe”. It’ll always be used so we might as well create a thick skin for ourselves.

As far as 'death and destruction' found 'the love of this world' doesn't quite make sense to me. If we subject our entire being to Christ, we still have to realize that 'balance' has to take place too. We still live on earth dealing with worldy matters. God knows this. We need to pray with a balanced amount of time for God, and we also need to work in moderation and with anything else. God wants all of us to live a happy and abundant life. We just need balance.

Great post Mark!

The Merry Widow said...

Actually, the Bible used the words sodomite and male prostitute, also the word dog was used for the male temple prostitutes, and that is from the original Hebrew.
I wonder how a gender challenged person would take to be called a sodomite?

tmw

Mark said...

As far as 'death and destruction' found 'the love of this world' doesn't quite make sense to me.

When we put this world first, we must put God second, third, forth etc... His teachings are not evolving, nor is His Holy word, the Bible. That is Man doing what he does best, putting man's desires first, then justifying God's approval with a little white-out on scripture.